Australian eCommerce Performance Report 2026

Research by Marketix Digital

Australian eCommerce Performance Report

 

Australian online spending reached a record $82.6 billion in 2025. But this headline does not reveal which categories generated the growth or how effectively major retailers serve online shoppers.


Marketix Digital combined national expenditure data, monthly retail figures and mobile performance measurements from 50 Australian-facing eCommerce websites to uncover patterns not presented in the original sources.


Key Findings

 

  • Australians spent $82.6 billion online in 2025, an increase of 14%.

  • Marketix Digital estimates that online expenditure averaged $8,429 per participating household.

  • The available figures imply approximately 88 online transactions per participating household during 2025.

  • Online marketplaces and food and liquor generated approximately 41% of the calculated category-level spending increase.

  • Books, stationery and multimedia recorded the fastest category growth at 24.1%.

  • Only 16% of the 50 websites analysed by Marketix Digital passed all three mobile Core Web Vitals.

  • Interaction responsiveness was the most common performance problem, with only 20% of sampled websites achieving a good INP result.


Australian Online Spending Reached $82.6 Billion


Australian eCommerce reached a new high in 2025. Consumers spent $82.6 billion online, representing annual growth of 14% and approximately 24% of total retail expenditure.


Participation also reached record levels. Approximately 9.8 million households made an online purchase during the year, equal to 82% of Australian households. Online shopping was not merely occasional: 41% of participating households purchased online at least once a fortnight.


The average basket value was $96, suggesting that growth was driven by frequent purchasing across millions of households rather than only a small number of high-value orders.


Together, these figures show the scale of Australian eCommerce in 2025:

 

  • $82.6 billion in online expenditure

  • 14% annual growth

  • 24% of total retail expenditure

  • 9.8 million participating households

  • 82% household participation

  • $96 average basket value

  • 41% purchasing online at least fortnightly


Estimated Online Spending Reached $8,429 per Participating Household

 

Australian Online Spending Per Household

 

Australia Post reported that Australians spent $82.6 billion online in 2025, with 9.8 million households participating in online shopping.


These figures can be combined to estimate how much online expenditure occurred for each participating household.


Marketix Digital Original Analysis


$82.6 billion ÷ 9.8 million households = $8,429


Marketix Digital estimates that online expenditure averaged approximately $8,429 per participating household in 2025. This is equivalent to approximately:

 

  • $702 per month

  • $162 per week

  • $23 per day


The calculation provides a clearer indication of the commercial value represented by an online-shopping household. At a national level, each participating household was associated with more than $8,400 in annual online expenditure.


This does not mean every household spent the same amount. It is a national average calculated across all households that made at least one online purchase, with actual spending likely varying considerably by income, age, location and shopping frequency.


Participating Households Made an Estimated 88 Online Purchases

 

88 Online Purchases Per Household

 

The reported average online basket value was $96 in 2025. Marketix Digital used this figure to estimate how many purchases would produce the calculated average household expenditure of $8,429.


Marketix Digital Original Analysis


$8,429 ÷ $96 = 87.8


This implies approximately:

 

  • 88 online purchases per year

  • 7.3 purchases per month

  • 1.7 purchases per week

  • Approximately one purchase every four days


The estimate helps explain how Australia reached $82.6 billion in online expenditure despite an average basket value below $100. The size of the market reflects both widespread household participation and frequent purchasing throughout the year.


This is an indicative Marketix Digital estimate, not an official transaction count. The total expenditure, participating-household and average-basket figures may use different underlying datasets or samples. Purchase frequency would also vary significantly between occasional and highly active online shoppers.


Where Australians Spent Their Money Online


Australian online expenditure was concentrated in a small number of large retail categories. Online marketplaces led the market with $18.9 billion in expenditure, followed by food and liquor at $16 billion.


Together, these two categories attracted almost $35 billion in online spending during 2025. Fashion and apparel, home and garden, and consumer electronics also exceeded $9 billion each.

 

Category

2025 expenditure

Annual growth

Online marketplaces

$18.9bn

13.0%

Food and liquor

$16.0bn

14.0%

Fashion and apparel

$11.6bn

11.5%

Home and garden

$11.4bn

10.5%

Consumer electronics

$9.2bn

16.0%

Hobbies and recreational goods

$5.0bn

17.1%

Department stores

$4.3bn

19.5%

Health and beauty

$3.8bn

15.1%

Books, stationery and multimedia

$2.5bn

24.1%

The largest categories were not necessarily the fastest-growing. Online marketplaces remained the biggest destination for online expenditure, but their 13% growth rate was below several smaller categories.


Books, stationery and multimedia recorded the fastest percentage growth at 24.1%, followed by department stores at 19.5% and hobbies and recreational goods at 17.1%. However, their smaller starting values meant they added fewer dollars than marketplaces, food and liquor, or consumer electronics.


The category figures total approximately $82.7 billion, slightly above the reported national total of $82.6 billion because Australia Post presents category expenditure in rounded values.


Which Categories Generated the Most New Spending?

 

Australian eCommerce Spending Leaders

 

Percentage growth alone does not show how much additional expenditure a category generated. A fast-growing category with a small starting value can add fewer dollars than a larger category growing at a more moderate rate.


Marketix Digital Original Analysis


Australia Post provides each category’s 2025 expenditure and annual growth rate but does not present the previous year’s expenditure in the same table. Marketix Digital reconstructed the estimated 2024 value using:

 

Estimated 2024 expenditure = 2025 expenditure 1 + annual growth rate

 

The estimated dollar increase was then calculated as:


Estimated increase = 2025 expenditure − estimated 2024 expenditure

 

Category

Estimated 2024 expenditure

2025 expenditure

Estimated increase

Online marketplaces

$16.73bn

$18.90bn

$2.17bn

Food and liquor

$14.04bn

$16.00bn

$1.96bn

Consumer electronics

$7.93bn

$9.20bn

$1.27bn

Fashion and apparel

$10.40bn

$11.60bn

$1.20bn

Home and garden

$10.32bn

$11.40bn

$1.08bn

Hobbies and recreational goods

$4.27bn

$5.00bn

$0.73bn

Department stores

$3.60bn

$4.30bn

$0.70bn

Health and beauty

$3.30bn

$3.80bn

$0.50bn

Books, stationery and multimedia

$2.01bn

$2.50bn

$0.49bn

Online marketplaces generated the largest estimated dollar increase at $2.17 billion, despite growing by 13%. Food and liquor followed with approximately $1.96 billion in additional expenditure.


By comparison, books, stationery and multimedia recorded the fastest growth rate at 24.1%, but its estimated dollar increase was approximately $486 million because it began from a much smaller base.


This distinction matters commercially. Percentage growth indicates momentum, while the dollar increase shows where the largest amount of new expenditure entered the market. Large established categories can therefore generate more new spending even when smaller categories grow faster.


These are Marketix Digital estimates based on Australia Post’s rounded 2025 expenditure and annual growth figures. They are not published 2024 category totals, and minor differences may result from rounding.


Two Categories Generated 41% of Calculated Growth

 

Two Categories Generated 41% of Calculated Growth

 

The dollar increases calculated in the previous section can also be used to determine how much each category contributed to the combined increase across the nine measured categories.


Marketix Digital Original Analysis


Marketix Digital divided each category’s estimated spending increase by the combined increase across all nine categories:

 

Category contribution = Estimated category increase Combined estimated increase × 100

 

Category

Estimated spending increase

Contribution to calculated growth

Online marketplaces

$2.17bn

21.5%

Food and liquor

$1.96bn

19.4%

Consumer electronics

$1.27bn

12.6%

Fashion and apparel

$1.20bn

11.8%

Home and garden

$1.08bn

10.7%

Hobbies and recreational goods

$0.73bn

7.2%

Department stores

$0.70bn

6.9%

Health and beauty

$0.50bn

4.9%

Books, stationery and multimedia

$0.49bn

4.8%

Online marketplaces contributed approximately 21.5% of the calculated category-level increase, while food and liquor contributed a further 19.4%. Combined, these two categories generated approximately 40.9%, or roughly 41%, of the estimated increase.


The five largest contributors, online marketplaces, food and liquor, consumer electronics, fashion and apparel, and home and garden, accounted for approximately 76% of calculated growth. This shows that most new online expenditure was concentrated in already substantial retail categories.


Fast percentage growth did not always translate into a large contribution. Books, stationery and multimedia grew by 24.1%, but contributed only 4.8% of the calculated increase because its market was considerably smaller.


These contributions are Marketix Digital estimates based on Australia Post’s rounded category expenditure and growth figures. They describe each category’s share of the combined increase across the nine categories analysed, not an official Australia Post breakdown of national growth.


Fast Growth Did Not Always Mean the Largest Dollar Opportunity

 

Fast Growth vs Dollar Opportunity

 

A category’s growth rate measures how quickly it expanded, but it does not show the actual value of new expenditure. The amount added also depends on how large the category was at the beginning of the year.


Marketix Digital Original Analysis

 

Category

Annual growth

Estimated dollar increase

2025 expenditure

Books, stationery and multimedia

24.1%

$485m

$2.5bn

Department stores

19.5%

$702m

$4.3bn

Consumer electronics

16.0%

$1.27bn

$9.2bn

Food and liquor

14.0%

$1.96bn

$16.0bn

Online marketplaces

13.0%

$2.17bn

$18.9bn

Books, stationery and multimedia recorded the fastest growth at 24.1%, but added approximately $485 million in estimated expenditure. Its high growth rate was applied to a comparatively small starting market.


Online marketplaces produced the opposite result. The category grew by a more moderate 13%, yet added approximately $2.17 billion, more than four times the estimated increase recorded by books, stationery and multimedia.


Food and liquor showed a similar pattern. Its 14% growth translated into approximately $1.96 billion in additional spending. Department stores grew faster at 19.5%, but added approximately $702 million because the category was substantially smaller.


The comparison reveals two different forms of opportunity:

 

  • High percentage growth indicates strong momentum.

  • High dollar growth indicates a larger pool of new expenditure.


For retailers, suppliers and investors, the distinction is important. A fast-growing category may be attractive as an emerging opportunity, while a larger category growing at a slower rate can still generate far more immediate commercial value.


Across the categories analysed, existing market size had a major influence on the amount of new expenditure generated. Growth rates are therefore most meaningful when considered alongside both the category’s starting value and its absolute dollar increase.


These comparisons are based on Marketix Digital’s reconstruction of prior-year expenditure using Australia Post’s rounded 2025 category values and annual growth rates.

 

Australian Online Retail Continued Growing Through June 2025


The ABS monthly series shows that Australian online retail turnover continued to expand after the sharp changes experienced during the pandemic. Seasonally adjusted online turnover increased from $3.65 billion in June 2022 to $4.70 billion in June 2025.

 

Month

Seasonally adjusted online turnover

Annual movement

Online share of total retail

June 2022

$3.65bn

10.7%

June 2023

$3.86bn

5.9%

11.0%

June 2024

$4.16bn

7.8%

11.6%

June 2025

$4.70bn

13.0%

12.7%

The annual growth rate accelerated across these June comparisons. Turnover increased approximately 5.9% between June 2022 and June 2023, followed by 7.8% in 2024 and 13% in 2025.


In June 2025 alone, seasonally adjusted online turnover rose 3.9% from the previous month, adding $175.4 million. It was $542.1 million higher than in June 2024.


Non-Food Retail Generated Most Online Turnover


The ABS divides online sales into food and non-food retailing. In June 2025:

 

Segment

Online turnover

Monthly growth

Share of online turnover

Food

$1.45bn

2.5%

30.8%

Non-food

$3.25bn

4.5%

69.2%

Total

$4.70bn

3.9%

100%

Non-food retail generated more than twice the online turnover of food retail during the month. It also accounted for approximately 80% of the $175.4 million monthly increase, adding $140.5 million compared with $35 million from food.


Compared with June 2024, food online turnover increased from $1.26 billion to $1.45 billion, while non-food turnover rose from $2.90 billion to $3.25 billion. Both segments therefore contributed to the 13% annual increase.


Online Retail’s Share Continued to Rise


In original terms, online sales represented 12.7% of total retail turnover in June 2025, up from 11.9% in May and 11.6% in June 2024.


The penetration rate differed sharply between retail segments:

 

  • Online food sales represented 7.2% of total food retail turnover.

  • Online non-food sales represented 19% of total non-food retail turnover.


This shows that almost one-fifth of non-food retail expenditure captured by the ABS occurred online by June 2025.


November and December Produced the Largest Seasonal Peaks


The original monthly series shows a clear end-of-year spending pattern:

 

  • November recorded the highest original monthly turnover in 2022 and 2023.

  • December recorded the highest result in 2024.

  • Original turnover reached $5.28 billion in November 2024 and a record $5.35 billion in December 2024.


These peaks largely disappear from the seasonally adjusted series, confirming that events such as Black Friday, Cyber Monday and Christmas materially affect unadjusted monthly online expenditure.


The June 2025 release was the final edition of the ABS Retail Trade publication. The series therefore supports analysis only through June 2025 and should not be presented as a complete measure of online retail activity for the full year.


Important Methodological Difference


The ABS reported that online retail represented 12.7% of total retail turnover in June 2025, while Australia Post estimated that online purchases represented 24% of retail spending during 2025.


These figures should not be directly compared. The organisations use different data sources, definitions, coverage and reporting periods. They are separate indicators of Australian online retail activity, not conflicting measurements of the same dataset.

 

Only 16% of Sampled Websites Passed All Core Web Vitals

 

Only 12.5% Pass All Core Web Vitals

 

Strong online demand does not automatically mean retailers provide a strong mobile experience. To examine this, Marketix Digital benchmarked prominent Australian-facing eCommerce websites using real-user performance data.


Marketix Digital Original Analysis


Marketix Digital analysed 50 transactional eCommerce websites across 13 retail categories. The sample included department stores, marketplaces, fashion retailers, supermarkets, electronics stores and home and garden businesses.


The analysis used mobile data from the Chrome UX Report, which measures the experiences of real Chrome users. Results represent the 75th percentile over a rolling 28-day period rather than a single laboratory test.


Google’s good thresholds were applied consistently:

 

  • LCP: 2,500 milliseconds or less

  • INP: 200 milliseconds or less

  • CLS: 0.10 or less


A website was counted as passing all Core Web Vitals only when it achieved a good result for all three measurements.

 

Metric

Websites rated good

Pass rate

Largest Contentful Paint

30 of 50

60%

Interaction to Next Paint

10 of 50

20%

Cumulative Layout Shift

28 of 50

56%

All three Core Web Vitals

8 of 50

16%

Only 8 of the 50 sampled websites passed all three mobile Core Web Vitals simultaneously:

 

  • IKEA Australia

  • Adairs

  • Cotton On

  • Country Road

  • Kathmandu

  • Amazon Australia

  • Temu Australia

  • SHEIN Australia


The remaining 42 websites, or 84% of the sample, failed at least one of the three measurements. Passing an individual metric was therefore considerably more common than delivering a consistently good result across loading speed, interaction responsiveness and visual stability.
The benchmark used data covering 8 August to 4 September 2026. Page-level measurements were used where sufficient data was available; otherwise, the documented mobile origin-level result was used as a fallback. Google’s CrUX methodology explains these data-eligibility and aggregation requirements.


These findings apply only to the 50 websites analysed. The sample was selected to provide broad category coverage and was not random or weighted by retailer revenue, traffic or market share. It should therefore be treated as a benchmark of the sampled retailers, not every eCommerce website operating in Australia.


Interaction Responsiveness Was the Main Performance Constraint

 

INP Leads Performance Across 48 Sites

 

The median results show that loading speed and visual stability were generally stronger than interaction responsiveness across the 50-site sample.


Marketix Digital Original Analysis

 

Metric

Sample median

Assessment

Largest Contentful Paint

2,310 ms

Good

Interaction to Next Paint

308 ms

Needs improvement

Cumulative Layout Shift

0.08

Good

First Contentful Paint

1,469 ms

Supporting metric

Time to First Byte

719 ms

Supporting metric

The median Largest Contentful Paint was 2,310 milliseconds, placing it inside Google’s good threshold of 2,500 milliseconds. This indicates that the main content generally became visible within the recommended timeframe.


The median Cumulative Layout Shift was 0.08, also within Google’s good threshold of 0.10. At the sample level, visual stability was therefore less problematic than interaction responsiveness.


However, the median Interaction to Next Paint was 308 milliseconds. Google classifies INP of 200 milliseconds or less as good, between 200 and 500 milliseconds as needing improvement, and above 500 milliseconds as poor.


INP measures how quickly a page provides visual feedback after a user interacts with it. On an eCommerce website, relevant interactions can include:

 

  • Opening navigation menus

  • Selecting product filters

  • Changing product variations

  • Adding an item to the cart

  • Opening delivery or payment options

  • Using interactive search features


Only 10 of the 50 websites analysed, or 20%, achieved a good mobile INP result. By comparison, 60% achieved a good LCP result and 56% achieved a good CLS result.


The Marketix benchmark therefore identified interaction responsiveness as the most widespread Core Web Vitals constraint in the sample. Many websites reached Google’s recommended loading and visual-stability thresholds but remained slower to respond after a shopper attempted to use the page.


FCP and TTFB were included as supporting diagnostic measurements. They can help explain how quickly the browser receives and begins displaying content, but they are not part of the three current Core Web Vitals used for the overall assessment.


These results identify a technical pattern, not a measured commercial outcome. Without retailer-level traffic, transaction and conversion data, the analysis cannot determine how much revenue, if any, was affected by slower interaction responsiveness.


High Online Demand Did Not Guarantee Strong Mobile Performance

 

Online demand versus mobile performance

 

Marketix Digital compared category-level expenditure with the mobile performance of retailers operating in those markets. The clearest contrast appeared between food and liquor businesses and marketplace-focused websites.


Marketix Digital Original Analysis

 

Category

2025 expenditure

Annual growth

Median LCP

Median INP

Median CLS

Passing all three

Food and liquor

$16.0bn

14%

4,068 ms

447 ms

0.60

0 of 4

Online marketplaces

$18.9bn

13%

1,841 ms

201 ms

0.01

2 of 4 measurable sites

Australia Post reported $16 billion in food and liquor online expenditure, following annual growth of 14%. However, none of the four food and liquor websites analysed by Marketix Digital passed all three mobile Core Web Vitals.


The category recorded:

 

  • Median LCP of 4,068 milliseconds

  • Median INP of 447 milliseconds

  • Median CLS of 0.60

  • Zero of four websites passing all three metrics


The median LCP and INP results were classified as needing improvement, while the median CLS result was well above Google’s poor threshold of 0.25. Food and liquor therefore recorded the weakest combined median performance among the major categories in the Marketix sample.


Marketplace and variety websites produced a different result. Australia Post reported $18.9 billion in expenditure through pure online marketplaces, with annual growth of 13%.


Among the four marketplace and variety websites with complete mobile data:

 

  • Median LCP was 1,841 milliseconds

  • Median INP was 201 milliseconds

  • Median CLS was 0.01

  • Two of four websites passed all three metrics


This category achieved the highest overall pass rate in the sample. Its median LCP and CLS were comfortably within Google’s good thresholds, while median INP missed the good threshold by only one millisecond.


The comparison suggests that substantial demand can exist alongside very different levels of mobile technical performance. Food and liquor combined high expenditure with weak sampled results, while marketplace and variety websites combined higher expenditure with considerably stronger performance.


However, this does not prove that website performance caused either category’s expenditure or growth. The Australia Post figures measure category-level demand, while the Marketix analysis covers a small, non-random selection of individual websites. The marketplace and variety sample is also an indicative proxy and does not exactly match Australia Post’s definition of pure online marketplaces.

 

What the Findings Mean for Australian Retailers


Australian eCommerce growth is concentrated. Online marketplaces and food and liquor generated approximately 41% of the calculated category-level spending increase, making them major contributors to new online expenditure.


Retailers should consider both percentage growth and dollar growth, alongside broader Australian eCommerce traffic statistics showing how shoppers access and interact with online retailers. A smaller category may grow quickly while generating less new expenditure than a large category expanding at a moderate rate.


The practical priorities are clear:

 

  • Measure category demand in both percentages and dollars.

  • Compare market opportunity with the website’s ability to serve shoppers.

  • Prioritise interaction responsiveness alongside loading speed.

  • Use real-user field data rather than relying only on one-off laboratory tests.

  • Track performance continuously as websites, third-party scripts and customer behaviour change.


The strongest opportunity sits where growing demand and weak digital execution overlap. Retailers that identify and close this gap will be better positioned to capture the next stage of Australian online growth.

 

Methodology


This report combines Australia Post expenditure data, ABS online retail figures and Marketix Digital’s analysis of Australian-facing eCommerce websites.


Data Sources

 

  • Australia Post eCommerce Report 2026: National expenditure, household participation, basket value, category expenditure and annual growth.

  • ABS Retail Trade: Monthly online turnover, food and non-food sales, and online retail’s share of total retail from January 2022 to June 2025.

  • Google Chrome UX Report: Mobile LCP, INP, CLS, FCP and TTFB measurements.

 

The ABS Retail Trade publication ceased after June 2025. No ABS online-turnover claims were made beyond that date.


Marketix Digital Calculations


Marketix Digital calculated:

 

Household expenditure = Total online expenditure Participating households

Estimated purchases = Household expenditure Average basket value

Estimated 2024 category value = 2025 expenditure 1 + annual growth

Category contribution = Estimated category increase Combined increase across all categories × 100

 

All reconstructed category values are estimates based on Australia Post’s rounded figures.


Website Sample


Marketix Digital collected mobile CrUX data on 6 September 2026, covering 8 August to 4 September 2026.


The 50 websites included:

 

  • Department stores: Kmart, Myer, Big W, Target and David Jones

  • Home and garden: Bunnings, IKEA, Temple & Webster, Adairs, Freedom, Spotlight, Fantastic Furniture and Amart

  • Electronics: JB Hi-Fi, Officeworks, The Good Guys, Harvey Norman and Appliances Online

  • Food and liquor: Woolworths, Coles, Dan Murphy’s and BWS

  • Health and beauty: Chemist Warehouse, Mecca, Adore Beauty, Sephora and Priceline

  • Fashion: The Iconic, Cotton On, Country Road, Princess Polly, Culture Kings, City Beach and Lorna Jane

  • Other categories: Rebel, Anaconda, Kathmandu, Supercheap Auto, Petbarn, Pet Circle, Booktopia, Dymocks, Kogan, Amazon Australia, eBay Australia, Temu, SHEIN, Baby Bunting, Michael Hill and Prouds


Page-level mobile data was used where available, with origin-level data used as a fallback. Country Road and SHEIN lacked sufficient mobile data and were excluded from performance calculations, leaving 48 measurable websites.


Google’s good thresholds were:

 

  • LCP: 2,500 ms or less

  • INP: 200 ms or less

  • CLS: 0.10 or less


A website passed only when all three measurements were good.


Limitations


The website analysis covers a fixed sample of 50 Australian-facing transactional websites. It is not random, market-weighted or representative of every Australian eCommerce website.


Category sample sizes varied, performance can change over time, and category expenditure cannot be attributed to individual retailers. The analysis does not claim that website performance caused differences in spending or growth.

 

Data Sources


This report combines national eCommerce data, monthly retail figures and real-user mobile performance measurements. The complete sources are:

 

 

About Marketix Digital


Marketix Digital is a Sydney-based SEO agency helping Australian eCommerce businesses increase organic visibility, qualified traffic and revenue.

 


Led by Shoaib Mughal, the team combines more than 20 years of SEO experience with technical analysis, content strategy and commercial insight. Marketix focuses on sustainable growth and measurable business outcomes rather than rankings alone.